world bank report

The World Bank Releases Latest Guide To Remittances Prices Worldwide

Remittance Prices Worldwide (RPW), a subsidiary of the World Bank, has released its quarterly report on the costs of sending money across major remittance “corridors”.

Since September 2008, RPW has been monitoring the costs of international transfers, partly as a means to measure the progress of different regions towards global cost reduction objectives and targets, such as the G20 Commitment, which seeks to bring the average global cost of sending money abroad to less that 5% of the total sent.

The report reveals that the current global average fee is 7.45%, for Q1 2017 – a slight increase on the 7.4% recorded in Q4 2016.

RPW say that during that period, 77% of all services charged an average cost of less than 10%, with South Asia the best performing region, where average fees were just 5.4%. Sub Saharan Africa, on the other hand, recorded an average of 9.81% - up from 9.48% the previous quarter.

The report also showed that banks are still the most expensive Remittance Service Providers – with an average charge of 11.18 percent!

The global average cost for sending remittances has remained below 8% since Q3 2014 – a decline of 2.2 percentage points since Q1 2009, when the figure was as high as 9.67%.

Interestingly, the RPW also record a figure known as the “Smart Remitter Target (SmaRT) which aims to reflect the cost that a “savvy consumer with access to sufficiently complete information” might pay to make a remittance.

To make this calculation, RPW takes the simple average of the three cheapest services for sending whatever is the equivalent of USD 200 across each different corridor, expressed as a percentage of the total amount sent. There are other criteria too. The service provider must be able to complete the transaction in less that 5 days and be either geographically accessible or through straightforward access to the technology or device necessary to use the service.

For Q1 2017, the SmaRT global average was 5.72%; another slight increase from the previous quarter’s 5.54%

Another interesting thing to note about the SmaRT calculation is that for Q1 2017, 55 of the 365 remittance “corridors” had fewer than 3 qualifying services - which suggests that there is much still to be done in terms of bringing competitive, affordable remittance services to every part of the world.

Within the G8 collection of countries, the average cost of sending remittances decreased slightly to 6.99%, from 7.02% in Q4 2016. The UK, Canada, Germany and Japan all exhibit total average costs higher than the global average, whilst France, Italy, Russia and the United States all exhibit lower than the global average.

Indeed, in the latest report, the UK displayed the largest increase in total average cost of sending money abroad of all the G8 countries - from 7.43%, to 7.86%.

Over the past 5 years, France is the only country to have achieved a reduction of 5 percentage points in five years – which is in line with the global cost reduction objectives. All other countries have failed to achieve the targets set.

Within G20 countries, the average cost remained stable at 7.58%, with South Africa being the costliest country to send remittances from; 17.78% - it was over 20% in Q1 2013! Japan is the second most expensive on the list (11.65%), whilst Russian is the cheapest, at just 2.09%, followed by the Republic of Korea (4.87%), Saudi Arabia (5.2%), the U.S. (5.76%), and Brazil (5.86%).

The most expensive countries to remit to were China (10.26%), Indonesia (7.84%) and Turkey (7.62%).

RPW also keeps track of the costs of remitting from three separate RSP types; commercial banks, Money Transfer Organisations (MTOs) and Post Office services. The fees associated with banks and MTO’s have dropped over the past five years, whilst Post Office services have proved volatile, but below the global average, along with MTOs. Banks remain above the global average.

The RPW has been quick to acknowledge the disruption of services within the money transfer industry and now records the instruments from which transactions are made and received. The cheapest method is mobile money, at 3.73%, whilst debit or credit card transactions stood at 6.23%, and cash, the next cheapest option, at 6.99%.

Banks remained the most expensive option at 8.0%. When funds are sent to a mobile wallet, the average cost, at 5.85%, is significantly cheaper than sending to a bank account at a different bank – the most expensive option at 8.09%.

You can find the RPW report by clicking here



Comparison tool

Sending Currency
Buying Currency
Send USD Receive

Latest Articles

Martin Ham

Very useful information and fairly up to date! I would definitely recommend the site for anyone interested in exchanging currencies!

Etta and Pierre Deschamps, Documentree Films

We regularly receive funds from overseas and used the Moneycloud to find an FX company who have helped us with a much better exchange rate than our high street bank. We're 3-4% better off as a result. Thank you the Moneycloud
Repatriating funds - sending money back home


When returning funds, profits or receipts from overseas back to your home country, the process can seem daunting. It is just a question of understanding the relevant regulations and tax rules. At The Money Cloud, we show you how to get it right first time and how to maximise your money.

washington hotel


As an overseas investor, regardless of the method of hotel management you will decide to opt for, you will be exposed to what are often volatile exchange rates, whether paying for your investment, running costs and overseas supplies and hotel management employees. Read the definitive guide.

Market Insights

Sign up for our newsletter.

Thank You for subscribing to our Newsletter

You have successfully signed up to our Newsletter